Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Strategies +

You have a classroom full of college students eager to start anew and acclimate themselves into the college environment. Many of them are high achieving students on academic scholarships or high scorers on the ACT/SAT tests. Others are students who may fall on the scale of mediocrity or maybe even less than stellar performance on college entrance exams, however, they have been accepted and are official college students and sitting in your classroom. Whatever type of students that may have come, many of them are not college ready and/or do not come equipped with strategies on how to succeed academically.

T. Hicks, writer of Crafting Digital Writing: Composing Texts Across Media Genres, highlights a project by the Council of Writing Program Administrators (CWPA), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and the National Writing Project (NWP), summarized 8 attributes that a student can have to be college and career ready (T. Hicks, p. 26):
  • Curiosity
  • Openness
  • Engagement
  • Creativity 
  • Persistence
  • Responsibility
  • Flexibility
  • Metacognition 
Of these 8 attributes, I am most interested in metacognition. Think about your thinking, the learning strategy that causes students to question how their learning. A strategy that many educators are adopting within their classrooms. On our campus, we are using the metacognitive strategy to engage our students in the learning process. We are wanting to develop them into critical thinkers and be able to provide solutions within our society. According to McGuire (2015), getting students to understand this strategy  develops them into thinking of themselves as problem solvers (McGuire, p. 16).

So how does an educator teach students to use metacognition as a strategy? Dr. Sandra McGuire tells us that "introducing Bloom's Taxonomy is an extremely efficient and effective way to help students take metacognitive control of their own learning" (McGuire, p.28).
(Two versions of Bloom;s Taxonomy: Original and Revised) 

Why Bloom's Taxonomy one may ask? Well, if we instruct students on understanding the difference on how they learned in high school and how they can be college ready or prepare to succeed academically, will open their eyes to seeing where to begin to 'think about their thinking'. I often begin my classes with students in understanding the levels of Bloom's Taxonomy first. I ask them to tell me what their routine was in high school and then to tell me what are they doing different now that they are in college or if their routine is the same. Most of them reply that it is different than high school and they actually haven't determined what actions they needed to take to do well in college. I provide them a brief example of how high school was same hours, same classes and same times Monday-Friday, whereas in college there's a little flexibility where classes may or may not be back to back and not meet everyday of the week. I then ask questions on how did they study in high school versus studying habits now in college. This whole process I do to make them begin the 'thinking about your thinking process' and I break down the levels of Bloom's to help them make a connection. 

As the semester runs, each week is a challenge to see how creative we can become in teaching our students how to learn. Many professors/instructors may feel that students should come to college with these skills/strategies already, however, as educators we have realized that many have not been taught how to learn. Using a metacognitive strategy and incorporating into our courses will prompt students to think about their thinking and improve their learning experience.

Blooms Taxonomy, by R. Overbaugh and L. Schultz, n.d., and retrieved from http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/images/1/1e/Bloom_1.jpg
Hicks, T. (2013). Crafting Digital Writing: Composing Texts Across Media and Genres. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
McGuire, S. Y. (2015). Teach Students How To Learn. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.


3 comments:

  1. Jessica, I thought the 8 attributes given in the text were very interesting since I had never thought of these as influencing the college and career readiness of students. Looking into metacognition was a smart choice for you considering you teach at a higher level and I love that you have already begun talking about this with your students at the beginning of each year. I found an article by Kimberly D. Tanner called, "Promoting Student Metacognition," and while it is geared toward teaching biology, there was a table with sample self-questions to promote student metacognition about learning that could be applied in any subject area. I found these quite interesting and thought you might be able to use these along with the questions you are already asking. The questions are broken down into sections based on when they should be asked and the table also incorporates Bloom's Taxonomy words to show what level of cognitive thinking is being used for each set of questions, such as planning, monitoring, or evaluating. Having students think deeper about their thought processes will encourage them to try new strategies throughout their learning, help them understand where they are struggling, and how they can improve.
    Sources:
    Table: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3366894/table/T1/

    Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting Student Metacognition. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 113-120. Retrieved February 18, 2016, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3366894/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jessica, awesome post! Thanks for mentioning Bloom's Taxonomy. For the last few years, the county that I work for has been tossing around the idea of teachers doing away with using Bloom's Taxonomy and start using Webb's Depth of Knowledge. Webb's DOK focuses more on the cognitive level of the product or activities for the lesson I teach. Whereas Bloom's Taxonomy is a tool for teacher planning and helps with questioning.

    I believe that Bloom's Taxonomy and Webb's DOK should work hand in hand because the cognitive level at which the teacher is teaching should in fact match the cognitive level at which the students are being assessed.

    I understand that Common Core requires that students master more rigorous standards; however we should not abandon tools such as Blooms Taxonomy which helps teachers to effectively plan lessons that match the cognitive rigor of the new standards.

    Check out www.aps.edu/re/documents/resources/Webbs_DOK_Guide.pdf.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bloom's Taxonomy is an excellent tool to help teachers prepare effective lessons. However, in my experience as a classroom teacher, I find it extremely difficult to focus on Bloom's Taxonomy when Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs are not being met. Desautels (2014) explained that meeting the very basic, physiological,needs of your students contributed to warm and inviting environment that led to "brain-compatible learning." n the school I teach, I must do my best to meet those very basic needs my students have before we can even attempt to delve into higher order thinking. I feel that, as educators, we can get too focused on the latest and greatest method or teaching strategy and forget about those simple needs that so many of our students are lacking. At the end of the day, if a student's basic needs are not met, they will not be motivated to learn-no matter how well-planned our lessons are.

    Sources:

    Desautels, L. (2014). Addressing our needs: Maslow comes to life for educators and students. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/addressing-our-needs-maslow-hierarchy-lori-desautels

    ReplyDelete